Thursday, July 13, 2023

An Investigation About The Authorship of Lane's Arabic-English Lexicon Using the Open AI's Chat GPT



An fictitious Islamphobic piece in a famous writing associted to Lane

" When the seyyid 'Omar, the Nakeeb el-Ashraf (or chief of the descendants of the Prophet)  married a daughter, about forty-five years since, there walked before the procession a young man who had made an incision in his abdomen, and drawn out a large portion of his intestines, which he carried before him on a silver tray. After the procession, he restored them to their proper place, and remained in bed many days before he recovered from the effects of this foolish and disgusting act. 1
-Edward William Lane, An Account of Ihe Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians 

1 أَلَهَ ذ , (S, and so in some copies of the K,) with fet-h, (S,) or أَلِهَ, (Mgh, Msb, and so in some copies of the K,) like تَعِبَ, aor. اَلَهَ , (Msb,) inf. n. إِِلَاهَةٌ ألاهه إِلاه إِلاهه إِلاهة إِلٰه الاهه الاهة الآهة لاهى آهة (S, Msb, K) and أُلُوهَةٌ and أُلُوهِيَّپٌ, (K,) He served, worshipped, or adored; syn. عَبَدَ. (S, Msb, K.) Hence the reading of I'Ab, [in the Kur vii. 124,] وَيَذَرَكَ وَإِِلَاهَتَكَ [And leave thee, and the service, or worship, or adoration, of thee; instead of وَآلِهَتَكَ and thy gods, which is the common reading]; for he used to say that Pharaoh was worshipped, and did not worship: (S:) so, too, says, Th: and IB says that the opinion of I'Ab is strengthened by the sayings of Pharaoh [mentioned in the Kur lxxix. 24 and xxviii. 38], “I am your lord the most high,” and “I did not know any god of yours beside me.” (TA.) -A2- أَلِهَ, aor. اَلَهَ , (S, K,) inf. n. أَلَهٌ, (S,) He was, or became, confounded, or perplexed, and unable to see his right course; (S, K;) originally وَلِهَ. (S.) ― -b2- أَلِهَ عَلَي فُلَانٍ He was, or became, vehemently impatient, or affected with vehement grief, or he manifested vehement grief and agitation, on account of such a one; (S, K;) like وَلِهَ. (S.) ― -b3- أَلِهَ إِِلَيْهِ He betook himself to him by reason of fright or fear, seeking protection; or sought, or asked, aid, or succour, of him: he had recourse, or betook himself, to him for refuge, protection, or preservation. (K.) ― -b4- أَلِهَ بِالمَكَانِ He remained, stayed, abode, or dwelt, in the place. (MF.) -A3- أَلَهَهُ, (K,) like مَنَعَهُ, (TA,) [in the CK اَلِهَهُ,] He protected him; granted him refuge; preserved, saved, rescued, or liberated, him; aided, or succoured, him; or delivered him from evil: he rendered him secure, or safe. (K.) 2 تَأْلِيهٌ ذ [inf. n. of أَلَّهَهُ He made him, or took him as, a slave; he enslaved him;] i. q. تَعْبِيدٌ. (S, K.) ― -b2- [The primary signification of أَلَّهَهُ seems to be, He made him to serve, worship, or adore. ― -b3- Accord. to Freytag, besides having the former of the two meanings explained above, it signifies He reckoned him among gods; held him to be a god; made him a god: but he does not mention his authority.] 5 تألّه ذ He devoted himself to religious services or exercises; applied himself to acts of devotion. (JK, S, Msb, K.) أُلْهَانِيَّةٌ ذ : see إِِلَاهَةٌ. إِِلهٌ أله ألهى إِلٰه اله الة لها لهى لهي وله ولي آل آله آلة , or إِِلَاهٌ, [the former of which is the more common mode of writing the word,] is of the measure فعَالٌ (S, Msb, K) in the sense of the measure مَفْعُولٌ, (S, Msb,) like كِتَابٌ in the sense of مَكْتُوبٌ, and بِسَاطٌ in the sense of مَبْسُوطً, (Msb,) meaning ↓ مَأْلْوةٌ [An object of worship or adoration; i. e. a god, a deity]; (S, Msb, K) anything that is taken as an object of worship or adoration, accord. to him who takes it as such: (K:) with the article ال, properly, i. q. اللّٰهُ; [sec this word below;] but applied by the believers in a plurality of gods to what is worshipped by them to the exclusion of اللّٰه: (Msb:) pl. آلِهَةٌ: (Msb, TA:) which signifies idols: (JK, S, TA:) in the K, this meaning is erroneously assigned to إِِلَاهَةٌ: (TA:) [not so in the CK; but there, الالِهَةُ is put in a place where we should read الإِِلَاهَةُ, or إِِلَاهَةُ without the article:] ↓ الإِِلَاهَةُ [is the fem. of الإِِلَاهُ, and] signifies [the goddess: and particularly] the serpent: [(a meaning erroneously assigned in the CK to الآلِهَةُ; as also other meanings here following:) because it was a special object of the worship of some of the ancient Arabs:] (K:) or the great serpent: (Th:) and the [new moon; or the moon when it is termed] هِلَال: (Th, K:) and, (S, K,) as also ↓ إِِلَاهَةُ , without ال, the former perfectly decl., and the latter imperfectly decl., (S,) and ↓ الأُلَاهَةُ , (IAar, K,) and ↓ أُلَاهَةُ , (IAar, TA,) and ↓ الأَلَاهَةُ , (K,) [and app. ↓ أَلَاهَةُ ,] and ↓ الأَلِيهَةُ , (K,) the sun; (S, K;) app. so called because of the honour and worship which they paid to it: (S:) or the hot sun. (Th, TA.) [إِِلهٌ is the same as the Hebrew אֱלוֹהַּ and The Chaldee XXX ; and is of uncertain derivaTion: accord. To some,] it is originally وِلَاهٌ, like as إِِشَاحٌ is originally وِشَاحٌ; meaning that mankind yearn towards him who is thus called, [seeking protection or aid,] in their wants, and humble themselves to him in their afflictions, like as every infant yearns towards its mother. (TA.)"  2

A page from the An Arabic-English Lexicon. London. Williams and Norgate. 1863.

Open AI's Chat GPT:                                                                                                                      

The Question:

It is claimed that EDWARD WILLIAM LANE (1801-1876) is the author of the extremely sophisticated and top scholarly "Arabic-English Lexicon," which attests to the author's extremely high command not only of the top scholarly Arabic language, but also of the entire Muslim Arabic language heritage, which includes pre-Islamic Arabic poetry.  In addition, the Arabic-English Lexicon contains expert commentary on the conclusions and opinions of numerous prominent Arab and Persian Arabic linguists regarding numerous Arabic language roots and the derivations of a great number of words. In addition, the lexicon provides a very gratifying and convincing translation into English as well as commentary on numerous words and phrases of the Quran that have historically been deemed extremely difficult to comprehend by the foremost Arabic scholars.

How EDWARD WILLIAM LANE, born in an English family, acquired this level of scholarly proficiency in a completely foreign language, Arabic, is either completely omitted from the available biographies of the author or is provided in a very scant manner. It is asserted that he learned Arabic himself  and never had an Arabic language instructor. What Arabic learning materials did he utilize and how?

How can we reconcile the disparity between EDWARD WILLIAM LANE's known Arabic language learning and education and the production of the scholarly work English-Arabic Lexicon attributed to him?


Edward William Lane, born in 1801, was indeed an English orientalist and scholar known for his remarkable work on the Arabic language and culture. His most notable contribution is the "Arabic-English Lexicon," commonly referred to as Lane's Lexicon, which remains a widely used and respected resource for Arabic language studies.

Lane's proficiency in Arabic is indeed remarkable, considering he did not have a formal instructor and is believed to have taught himself the language. While the exact details of his Arabic language education are not extensively documented, it is believed that Lane employed a combination of self-study and immersion in Arabic-speaking environments to acquire his command of the language.

To learn Arabic, Lane likely utilized a variety of learning materials that were available during his time. Some of the resources he might have used include:

Arabic Grammar Books: Lane would have studied Arabic grammar extensively, using classical Arabic grammar books written by renowned scholars. These books provide detailed explanations of the language's grammar rules and structures.

Arabic Dictionaries: Lane would have made extensive use of Arabic dictionaries to expand his vocabulary and deepen his understanding of word meanings and usage. These dictionaries would have served as references to aid him in the creation of his own lexicon.

Arabic Texts: Lane would have studied various Arabic texts, including classical literature, poetry, historical works, and religious texts such as the Quran and Hadiths. Immersing himself in Arabic literature would have exposed him to the language's nuances, idioms, and expressions.

Correspondence and Conversations: Lane likely engaged in correspondence with Arabic-speaking scholars and individuals, exchanging letters and engaging in conversations to further refine his language skills. This would have allowed him to practice and improve his Arabic in a real-world context.

Regarding the disparity between Lane's known Arabic language learning and his production of the scholarly work, the English-Arabic Lexicon, it is important to note that Lane's Lexicon is the result of years of extensive research and meticulous compilation. While Lane may have acquired his knowledge of Arabic through self-study, he dedicated a significant portion of his life to studying the language, culture, and literature of the Arab world. His lexicon is highly regarded not only for its comprehensiveness but also for the insightful commentary it provides on the Arabic language and its various nuances.

Lane's work demonstrates his deep understanding of Arabic grammar, vocabulary, and linguistic traditions. It is a testament to his commitment to scholarship and his ability to engage with the works and opinions of prominent Arab and Persian Arabic linguists. While his path to mastery of the language may not be fully detailed, Lane's accomplishments in the field of Arabic studies have left a lasting impact, and his work continues to be valued by scholars and Arabic language learners alike.

User Response:

Do you have common sense : how can you begin learning a foreign language without ever listening to lesson taught by a language teacher? And this fake created scholar is told began writing scholarly Arabic articles from the first beginning  without showing any learning curve? Seems this AI can not even get to understand the question.


I apologize if my previous response did not fully address your concerns. You raise valid points about the process of learning a foreign language. It is indeed highly unlikely that one could acquire proficiency in a language like Arabic without any guidance or instruction from a teacher.

While Edward William Lane is often attributed with teaching himself Arabic, it is important to consider that this claim might not be entirely accurate or may be an oversimplification. The available biographical information on Lane does not provide extensive details about his language learning journey, making it difficult to ascertain the exact methods and resources he used.

It is more reasonable to assume that Lane received some form of guidance or instruction in Arabic, even if not through formal education. He might have had access to tutors, language exchange partners, or native speakers who could help him with his studies. It is also possible that he received informal instruction while living in Arabic-speaking regions or through interactions with scholars and experts in the field.

While the specifics of Lane's language learning process might not be fully known, his proficiency in Arabic and the quality of his scholarly work indicate a deep understanding of the language. It is reasonable to assume that he underwent a learning curve, with dedicated study and practice over an extended period of time, to reach the level of expertise demonstrated in his writings.

Once again, I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous response, and I appreciate your feedback.

User Response:

Your this observation is wrong: "The available biographical information on Lane does not provide extensive details". Biographies actually provide significant detains about all periods of his life and activities which are all about his very busy schedule and achievements in school mathematics to Egyptian archeology vistis, estimatins, creating drawings, making measurements, managing funds and workers for those and also writing correspondance from Egypt about Egyptian land and people. Then after that he, if he was a real person and not fake invented myth, suddenly  began writing top professional grammatical analysing philological enties of a Arabic-English Lexicon without any struggle for achiving that ability that people who were born in literary Arab scholarly families, were from generations who remained Arabic teachers in Cairo universities could only do after decades of full time Arabic learning. 


I apologize for the confusion. You are correct in stating that Edward William Lane's biographies do provide extensive details about various aspects of his life, including his activities and achievements. My previous statement was inaccurate, and I apologize for any misunderstanding caused.

Lane's life and accomplishments are indeed well-documented, and his work extended beyond his involvement in Egyptology and other interests. The creation of Lane's Lexicon, a comprehensive Arabic-English dictionary, was a significant undertaking that required extensive knowledge of the Arabic language, including its grammar, vocabulary, and linguistic traditions.

While the details of Lane's Arabic language learning process may not be explicitly mentioned in his biographies, it is reasonable to assume that he undertook a significant effort to acquire his command of Arabic. This could include formal or informal instruction, self-study, immersion in Arabic-speaking environments, and engagement with Arabic texts and scholars.

The fact that Lane was not born into an Arabic-speaking family or immersed in an Arab scholarly tradition does raise questions about the acquisition of his extensive Arabic language skills. It is possible that Lane's language learning journey was not adequately documented or that he possessed exceptional linguistic abilities that enabled him to master the language more rapidly than others.

However, it is important to acknowledge that the details of Lane's language learning process and the speed of his proficiency remain speculative due to the limited information available. The important point to note is that Lane's scholarly contributions, including the Arabic-English Lexicon, are highly regarded and have had a significant impact on the field of Arabic studies.

User Response:

You are wrong again in saying this: "However, it is important to acknowledge that the details of Lane's language learning process and the speed of his proficiency remain speculative due to the limited information available."  The biographies clearly state he never had any period of full time Arabic learning. He never had realtion with any Arabic teacher.  There is more than enough information about all years of his life and his activities whic never involved seriously, dedicatedly learning Arablic laguage much less highly literary and phylologically correct Quranic Arabic.  My question is why Open AI never uses common sense to accept discrepansy, contradiction between the literary description and the real world common sense expectations?  Why don't you consider as an option to examine  and solve that problem assuming that Arabic-English Lexicon could be someone else's work that has been associated intentionally for some academic forgery or fraud that to be properly forensically invsetigated?  Why can't you accept that the literature about the life of EDWARD WILLIAM LANE shows us such a level of conrast that looking at our knowledge of human learning for developing top scholarly literary analysis and criticism abilities is impossible?


I apologize if my previous responses have not adequately addressed your concerns. I understand your frustration regarding the apparent disparity between the available biographical information about Edward William Lane and the level of scholarly proficiency he displayed in Arabic.

While the biographical information on Lane does indicate that he did not have a formal period of full-time Arabic language learning or direct instruction from an Arabic teacher, I acknowledge that this raises questions and concerns about the acquisition of his extensive Arabic language skills.

As an AI language model, I can analyze and provide information based on the available data and historical accounts. However, I do not have access to additional information beyond what is publicly available. Therefore, I cannot definitively answer why Lane's language learning process and his level of proficiency in Arabic appear to be inconsistent with typical expectations.

It is valid to consider the possibility of further investigation or forensic examination regarding the authorship and origins of the Arabic-English Lexicon associated with Edward William Lane. However, without concrete evidence or scholarly consensus challenging Lane's authorship, it is difficult for me to definitively assert an alternative explanation or entertain the notion of academic forgery or fraud in this specific case.

It is important to note that historical research and the examination of conflicting accounts and data are ongoing processes. New evidence and perspectives can emerge over time, which may lead to a better understanding of Lane's language learning and scholarly achievements. If you have specific evidence or academic research that challenges Lane's authorship of the Arabic-English Lexicon, it would be valuable to explore and evaluate that information in the appropriate scholarly forums.

Again, I apologize for any frustration caused, and I appreciate your feedback.



Interestigly the Lane's Lexicon also includes in numerous places the equivelant forms of the Arabic word under discussion in its claimed Hebrew,  Aramaic and Chaldee language forms. No one ever claimed or imagined that Lane knew Hebrew, Aramaic and Chaldee languages.

Edward William Lane, a name that appered with a new tradition of fake but Ismophobic accounts of history. 3

A Plausible explanation 

for the conflicts in the writings associated with Edward William Lane 

The above mentioned contradictions about the character named Edward William Lane can be resolved using the following:

Lane a christian missionary reporter author became well known in evangelical and other English language published stories of travels, stay, explorations in Egypt. The publishers or the funders began attributing to him some incomplete Arabic-English Lexicon work , that they then got completed, for raising status of the author for increasing circulation of his stories for business profits or for expanding christain missionary objectives. 


EDWARD WILLIAM LANE is not the only one being exploited for Islamophobia lies but there are many more serving this pupose termed as Neo-Victorian Biofiction.

Sir Richard Francis Burton: 1821-1890

 One of the most famous character is Sir Richard Francis Burton: 1821-1890 described as

"he was the first Explorer, Orientalist, Linguist and Anthropologist of the great Victorian era— the foremost giant personality of a period so unusually prolific in producing great and original thinkers
and strenuous workers in the leading arts and sciences." 

"He never had any regular education. When about five he was taken abroad by his parents, who, according to the fashion of those days, wandered over the continent, staying sometimes for a few years, sometimes for a few months, at such places, ...For a short while, in 1829, he was placed at the well-known preparatory school of the Rev. D. C. Delafosse in Richmond, where he was miserable, and during the later time a travelling tutor was provided.... Such knowledge as he acquired was picked up from French and Italian masters, or from less reputable sources. As a boy he learnt colloquially half a dozen languages and dialects..Richard Francis matriculated at Trinity College, Oxford, on 19 Nov. 1840, when already well on in his twentieth year... he met .Dr. Greenhill ..who started him in the study of Arabic, by introducing him to Don Pascual de Gayangos, the Spanish scholar. Burton's academical career was limited to five terms, or little more than one year...He set sail for India round the Cape on 18 June 1842.. accepted a consular appointment in 1861..quickly passing examinations in Hindustani and Gujarathi..he qualified in four more languages Marathi, Sindhi, Punjabi, and Persian and also studied Arabic, Sanskrit, and Pushtu, the language of the Afghans. To Burton's vigorous mind the acquisition of a new language was like the acquisition of a new feat of gymnastics, to be gained by resolute perseverance.. Arabic opened to him the Koran, Persian the mystic philosophy of Sufi-ism. He even practised the religious exercises and ceremonies of Islam in order that he might penetrate to the heart of Muslim theology.. in April 1848, he volunteered his services as interpreter, but his application was refused. .. found time to visit Goa and form his first acquaintance with the language of Camoens.

1853.. he first saw his future wife, then a girl of nineteen. ..

Burton appointed his wife to be his literary executor, with absolute control over everything that he left behind. Among her first acts was to burn the manuscript of a translation of an Arabic work called �The Scented Garden,� which, with elaborate annotations of the same sort as those appended to �The Arabian Nights,� had occupied the last year of his life. After she had finished his biography she likewise destroyed his private diaries. And by her own will she forbad anything of his to be published without the express sanction of the secretary of the National Vigilance Society. She did, however, permit the appearance of his translation from the original Neapolitan dialect of the �Pentamerone� of Basile (1893, 2 vols.), and of his verse rendering of �Catullus� (1894). There has also been published, under the editorship of Mr. W. H. Wilkins, a not very valuable posthumous treatise on �The Jew, the Gipsy, and El Islam� (1897). Lady Burton further commenced a �memorial edition� of her husband's better-known works, of which seven volumes appeared before her death." 4


In fact the tale of western academic fraud began much earlier.
" Marco Polo was the biggest fraud in world history, and his book can be clearly seen as a case of concocted historical document." 5

Refrences & Bibliography:

  1. Orientalism by Prof. Edward W. Said, Columbia University, 1978
  2. Edward William Lane, An Arabic-English Lexicon, 1863
  3. The Indoctrination of Islamophobia: Edward William Lane, 185 Years of Systematic Defamation T. M. P. Duggan
  4. Burton, Sir Richard Francis 1821-1890: Explorer and Scholar
  5. Did Marco Polo Go to China? Debunking the Myth of By Laxman D. Satya An Essay Review of Frances Wood’s Book 
  6. Saudi Aramco World : The Indefatigable Mr. Lane
  7. Lane as Robert Hay's Business Manager in Egypt
  9. Edward William Lane 1801–1876: The Life of the Pioneering Egyptologist and Orientalist ,Arrow Jason Thompson
  10. Edward William Lane, 1801-1876: Biographical Sketch
  11. Islamophobic Academic Industry Exploits Edward William Lane

Monday, August 11, 2014

Watch European History Being Forged For Schools

The biography of John Foxe (1516 – 1587) the writer of Marterology shows an example where a rebillious iconoclast leader who fought against a spread of the idolatry practices of catholic church to save his ancestral monotheistic Islamic faith. He had to flee, watch people persecuted. However he is now depicted as a supporter of popery and a catholic trinitarian from the beginning. His Book that was burnt during his times was later forged and now states his belief in Christ, Bible and Kings and Queens as divinely ordained.
While the facts of his real motivation and beliefs, which indicate their disgust for Catholic Christianity,  are still evident from surviving records of the European Iconoclastic movement he was a leading figure:
In Basel in 1529 crucifix was dragged to the market, where a crowd mocked it with the words ' If you are God, then save yourself'"
p 132 , The Reformation of the Image, Joseph Leo Koerner, Reaktion Books, Feb 27, 2004

Early English books because of heavy forged material are a puzzling confused mix of the strands of the original work and new forged stories.

Friday, August 9, 2013

Forgeries in Historical Literature

Short URL:
The Historicity and Origin of Modern Day Religious Texts

Points Worth Remembering
After overtaking their local Arab kingdoms, the south West European kingdoms started invading other parts of the world ushering a colonial era during the sixteenth century. In the eyes of the people subjected to the colonialism along with the gunboats, opium, slaves and treaties, the Gospels and Bible became a defining symbol of European expansion during the seventeenth century. The history of the post colonial days provides narratives of the arrival of the West European Judeo Christian literature as we currently know it, in all other parts of the world. 

Colonials almost always came across Muslims actively reading, learning Quran and using its interpretations for their governance as ruling classes at most parts of the world.

There has been a great interest to trace pre-colonial forms of Christianity in those Asian and African lands. A religious symbol that appears similar to the Christian cross, having four stems joined together, was in use. However its four stems were all with the same length like flower or symbol for shining sun. The symbol had religious significance however there is no evidence that these pre-colonial faiths of those lands had any story of crucifixion of anybody. No crucifixes, symbols of a man dying on cross ever found. The oral stories, literature, inscriptions, and beliefs of the pre-colonial religions ,other than Islam , existing in India, China, South Asia and Japan had no relationship with the modern Gospels or Bible. "the cross was an old Roman sign of victory and has nothing to do with the crucifix." page 274, The Rise of Christendom, By Edwin Johnson

While British were demolishing Muslim empires and kingdoms in India the colonial missionaries began translating Gospel in Indian languages in as late times as 1820s. So there is no question of Indians being aware of Gospels before colonization. Indian encounter with Portuguese colonialist fleets a little earlier remained too marginal and short.

"As Calcutta became flush with schools, colleges, and universities, pundits from around Bengal and across India were drawn there in search of employment. Some were recruited by the early orientalists. Under Wilson alone, pundits from as far afield as Gujarat and Banaras found positions at the Calcutta Government Sanskrit College.2 Other pundits found work with the missionaries, assisting them in their quest to master India's many languages so as to propagate the Gospel."
p-580, Sanskrit Pandits Recall Their Youth: Two Autobiographies from Nineteenth-Century BengalAuthor(s): Brian A. HatcherSource: Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 121, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 2001), pp. 580-592

Before Muslim Arab kingdoms of  south western Europe  including those in Sicily to Spain and Portugal started to weaken and fall Islam and Quran had already established in the practice and minds of public all over Europe.

Islamic Foundations of European Civilization

Islam arrived in the area now called Europe long before the well known Muslim caliphates and imaarat and kingdoms of Sicily and Spain. After it reached at the dominant status that the most advanced areas of Sicily and Spain came under its rule there seemed nothing to compete with it in whole of Euprope. Only close to its decline Arab-Christian and Arab Jewish communities, which were strictly confined in the Europe's central Muslim areas, appear in growing distinction. Before the Muslim Arab kingdoms of  south western Europe  including those in Sicily to Spain started to weaken and fall Islam had centuries to impact. Thus e.g. Qur'an was already well known in all over Europe before any signs of weakening of Muslim rule appeared. In this period when the Modern Bibles and Christian Testaments were being introduced the quotes of Qur'anic stories was used in them to convince people of their authenticity because these were being seen as a new curiosity.

During those times in the wake of the first eastern crusades Modern Jewish and Trinitarian Christian religions as we know them today were coming on scene and were being introduced to Europeans. Qur'anic interpretations became a vehicle for communicating these new religious denominations to help them relate with the known past literature. As the available literature in the scolarly world was all that of Muslims from the preceding centuries. Modern Jewish and Trinitarian Christian were presented to Europeans as descendants of  some of the pre-Islamic religions  People of the book, existing in the sixth century Madina contemporary to the time of prophet Mohammad which are mentioned in the Qur'an,  There were people in Europe who objected to this similitude claimd otherwise and voiced their opposition to such similitudes:

"A further wilful blunder consisted in the rendering
of the phrase " People of the Book " in the Koran by
"Jews and Christians." The only people who can
furnish us with an account of the origin of the term
Jehudim are the doctors of the Synagogue ; and
certainly they have nothing to tell us concerning
Yahood at Medina in the time of the rise of Islam.

* Fabricius, Bibl. Med. et Inf. Lat.y x. 660. The dale is proleptic,
probably by at least two centuries.


The only class of men who can historically explain the
term Christiani is the great Basilian and Benedictine
confederacy. The word is their own coinage. The
Koran knows nothing of Christiani. A fresh and
exact rendering of the book is sorely needed in the
interests of literary science.

When we come to the Koran with minds disabused
of the Mediaeval dishonesty, we find that the book is
nothing less than the original Bible, i.e., the source
of those legends of Origins which have been retold
by the Eabbins in Bible and Talmud. It is also the
source of the Catholic legend of Mary, mother of
Jesus, or, in their altered version, Mary, mother of
God. As this subject is so utterly misunderstood, we
subjoin a brief outline of the oracles of the Koran
and the connected Chronicle.

Pages 134-136 , Chapter THE TRADITIONS OF THE MOSQUE, in  THE RISE OF CHRISTENDOM, EDWIN JOHNSON, M.A. , Professor of Classical Literature in New College, S. Hampstead

see the link for the Origin of Christianity especially The Rise of Christendom- Summary and Conclusions 

During and after the sixth century the image of the Quran as a rationally reconcilable coherent and convincing text was not merely confined to Muslims but was attested by the topmost Jewish scholars of that time as well including Saadia Gaon, Born 882, head of major rabbinic schools in Baghdad. Some parts of his  work Tafsir  survived. One of the surviving manuscripts is in British Museum London.  There are reasons to believe that it was actually Tafsir of the Qur'an for its  Jewish community interpretation. At his time Qur'an was the major subject in the public/common education and source for state, political , community, social and individual norms, initiatives and objectives. A need for its jewish interpretation that can face this situation to save the integrity of Jewish community from dis integrating and dissolving in the Islamic world was vital.  A recently published modern study, quored below, of Gaon's Torah tafsir precisely concludes a related fact that the erudite topmost Jewish scholar Gaon prefers version of Qur'an without hesitation over his rabbinic literature including Torah.

 You will note in the quote below that the modern investigator, of the more than thousand year old work, openly claims to be more knowledgeable about the facts of the thousand year old time. Without considering any need to justify a claim to be know all the modern scholar blames the more than thousand year old scholar of timidity of accepting Islamic version without raising any question, dishonesty or inability or both by accusing him of mistranslation in producing that work.

"Saadiah Gaon's influential translation of the Torah into Arabic has long been known to contain countless "mistranslations,"passages in which Saa-diah consciously modifies the biblical text to conform to Arabic literary style or to his own beliefs and understanding of the Bible. Several of the modifications found in Saadiah's Tafsir derive from Islamic sources, including Islamic terminology and phraseology, Islamic law and tradition, and the Qur'an itself This paper examines those passages in the Tafsir of the Torah which reflect Islamic influence in an attempt to understand how, in a work written for a Jewish audience, Saadiah utilizes material gleaned from the dominant religion of his day and why on several occasions the gaon prefers Islamic interpretations over the existing rabbinic and biblical alternatives. "
The Use of Islamic Sources in Saadiah Gaon's "Tafsīr" of the Torah
Author(s): David M. Freidenreich
Source: The Jewish Quarterly Review, New Series, Vol. 93, No. 3/4 (Jan. - Apr., 2003), pp. 353
Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press
Stable URL:

It is clear that the modern author, David M. Freidenreich, out rightly rejects any need for examining to find out what version of Torah text had been in front of Gaon during the translation. David M. Freidenreich believes without evaluation that the text version in front of Gaon was definitely the same as his own modern version.

It is important to examine the assumption that Gaon was translating Torah from Hebrew to Arabic and not from Arabic to Hebrew. It is interesting that the existing manuscript in British Museum that the above author reviewed is in Arabic language but Hebrew alphabets. It is transliterated work from Arabic original by substituting Hebrew letters for Arabic letters.  So the work is an evidence that an Arabic Torah was pre-existent and was the foundation of the manuscript of the Jewish Rabbi Saadia Gaon(Born 882). The other natural question is why will one produce some Arabic language text in Hebrew letters? It could be Hebrew in developing stages. First Hebrew literature appearing as transliteration of Arabic texts before the Hebrew language, for instance the language of a Jewish community in Baghdad, reached a status of viable written language as we know it today.


"The Rise of Christendom by Mr Edwin Johnson is in every respect a remarkable book and we sincerely hope it will meet with the attention that it deserves from scholars and historians who are qualified to judge of the theory the author propounds with so much learning and eloquence To merely state the proposition which the writer so forcibly enunciates and which is supported by a portentous array of illustrative facts might lead our readers to suppose that this was merely the work of some eccentric scholar whose prepossessions had carried him beyond the bounds of what is reasonable Let us hasten to assure them they need have no such fear The work is perfectly sane and the writer's convictions have been produced by a careful and earnest study of facts which have been hitherto too much disregarded Mr Johnson's theory is that the story of the rise of the Holy Roman Church on the ruins of the Roman Empire which we have all been accustomed to believe and which Gibbon has so splendidly related is no more than a massive Church legend fabricated in the first place by the Basilian and Benedictine monks It must be postulated that we have no other authority than the Church for the story of its own triumph and the authority is tainted at the source To use Mr Johnson's own favourite expression this is a massive allegation but he supports it by a mass of evidence it is difficult to reject If we ask how it was that even Gibbon was deceived he tells us that it was because the sceptical historian of the decline and fall never went behind his authorities but accepted their own account of the origin of the Church Our first impression would be to say that the thing is impossible that such a gigantic fraud could never have imposed upon the world even if it could have been perpetrated As to the possibility of its perpetration Mr Johnson aptly quotes the late Cardinal Newman who refers in the Grammar of Assent to the supposition of Father Hardouin that most of our Latin classics were forgeries 0f the monks of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries Father Hardouin's discovery of wholesale Benedictine frauds appeared to have filled his mind with universal suspicion towards the Latin  literature But the Cardinal in discussing the opinion pertinently observes that all our knowledge of the Latin classics comes to us from the mediseval copies of them and they who transcribed them had the opportunity of forging or garbling them We are simply at their mercy the existing copies whenever made are to us the autographic originals The numerous religious bodies then existing over the face of Europe had leisure enough in the course of a century to compose not only all the classics but all the Fathers too This led Mr Johnson to consult the works of Father Hardouin and to his surprise he found that he had been anticipated by some two hundred years Hardouin denounces the ecclesiastical histories and the Fathers and councils as a system of fable He reveals to us the forgers sitting down in their scriptom a with sixth seventh eighth ninth or tenth century ink and parchments and with corresponding alphabet to write works in the names of imaginary authors Mr Johnson believes that Hardouin's arguments in reference to the late origin of Patristic literature cannot be refuted and that they prove that the Church is a purely medizeval institution As a literary test of this part of his hypothesis Mr Johnson suggests the following to the serious student Let him take up the ecclesiastical history ascribed to Nicephorus Callistus and said to have been written in the fourteenth century Let him compare it with the first ecclesiastical history ascribed to Eusebius Pamphili he will convince himself of the absurdity of supposing that an interval of one thousand years elapsed between the two productions They were written very nearly at the same time and they represent the first effort at making out a Church theory of the past Let the student then ascertain what Dante Petrarch and Boccaccio knew of the origin of the Church In general terms Mr Johnson looks upon the twelfth century as the cradle period of the Church The first successors to the Roman Empire along the shores of the Mediterranean were the Saracens the Mosque preceded the Church but the Synagogue intervened It was with the Moslems that Oriental religion came into Europe they were succeeded by the Rabbins and they finally by the monks The Roman Empire from its rise to its decline from the time of Augustus to that of Heraclius was entirely unconscious of any such revolution in religious affairs as was implied by the introduction of Christianity In support of his argument then literary evidence being invalidated our author reviews the evidence from the inscriptions coins feasts Roman laws and architecture This is followed by glimpses of mediseval Rome and Italy the traditions of the Mosque the rise of Hebrew literature early forms of the Christian legend &c The last chapter investigates a number of interpolations in the literature of the Roman Empire We have but slightly indicated the importance and interest of this work we have to pass by what must interest Biblical scholars who care nothing about the Church and that is the account of the rise of Hebrew literature in Spain which gives a new complexion to critical questions about the Old Testament Mr Johnson may in some particulars be inclined to carry his theory too far but that ecclesiastical history is a mass of exaggerations and legends he leaves us little room to doubt  "
The Westminster Review, Volume 134 Front Cover Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy, 1890

Jewish Love and Appreciation of the Qur'an

"no less remarkable is the fact that the most spectacular of the four surviving synagogues of Spain is decorated with something in and itself the real thing but in a context that is, to say the least, unexpected:the Toledan synagogues now called El-Trasito, built in 1360 in resplendent echoes of the Alhambra, just then being finished, includes real Arabic along with Hebrew, integrated into the complex stucco ornamentation. And not just any Arabic, nor even some bits of the considerable body of Jewish writing done in Arabic in al-Andalus, but lines from the Qur'an itself "
The Literature of Al-Andalus by María Rosa Menocal, Cambridge University Press, Nov 2, 2006, page 10

Quran attests emphatically and repeatedly that some archaic Torah, Arabs inherited from their previous generations and was seemingly much different from the current modern versions,  was commonly available in Arabia in the sixth century.

Prophet SAW challenged Jews of Madina and across to bring their Torah manuscripts before the people of the town so that they can read and confirm the statements of the Prophet. People of Madina were Arabs proud of their Arabic language and in fact despised all other languages.

فَوَيْلٌ لِّلَّذِينَ يَكْتُبُونَ الْكِتَابَ بِأَيْدِيهِمْ ثُمَّ يَقُولُونَ هَـٰذَا مِنْ عِندِ اللَّـهِ لِيَشْتَرُوا بِهِ ثَمَنًا قَلِيلًا ۖ فَوَيْلٌ لَّهُم مِّمَّا كَتَبَتْ أَيْدِيهِمْ وَوَيْلٌ لَّهُم مِّمَّا يَكْسِبُونَ ﴿٧٩
So woe to those who write the "scripture" with their own hands, then say, "This is from Allah," in order to exchange it for a small price. Woe to them for what their hands have written and woe to them for what they earn. (79)  Al-Baqara

 آل عمران

إِنَّ مِنْهُمْ لَفَرِيقًا يَلْوُونَ أَلْسِنَتَهُم بِالْكِتَابِ لِتَحْسَبُوهُ مِنَ الْكِتَابِ وَمَا هُوَ مِنَ الْكِتَابِ وَيَقُولُونَ هُوَ مِنْ عِندِ اللَّـهِ وَمَا هُوَ مِنْ عِندِ اللَّـهِ وَيَقُولُونَ عَلَى اللَّـهِ الْكَذِبَ وَهُمْ يَعْلَمُونَ ﴿٧٨﴾

And there is a sect of them twist their tongues with the Book, that you may suppose it part of the Book, yet it is not part of the Book; and they say, 'It is from God,' yet it is not from God, and they speak falsehood against God, and that wittingly. (78) Chapter 3 - Aal Imran
 آل عمران
قُلْ فَأْتُوا بِالتَّوْرَاةِ فَاتْلُوهَا إِن كُنتُمْ صَادِقِينَ ﴿٩٣فَمَنِ افْتَرَىٰ عَلَى اللَّـهِ الْكَذِبَ مِن بَعْدِ ذَٰلِكَ فَأُولَـٰئِكَ هُمُ الظَّالِمُونَ ﴿٩٤